Passive and Active: Learning and Level Crossings

In railway signalling, one of the most problematic or challenging part is, subjectively, the level crossings. It is the part where the road meets the rail, where normal railway operation which is rigid and structured, meets the road operation that in some ways, very loose and has many variables. It’s an interface and interface always are challenging, but it is more challenging because the road or public users do not generally have an understanding of the railway operation.

Level crossings nomenclature or taxonomy is generally divided into passive and active. Passive means there is “no” action needed from the railway operation, while the active requires action from the railway operation, which is normally the operator. Passive cost less, but I think carries higher risk. Passive and active level crossings both requires a lot of consideration into design, like how the users (public) would do when they approach and use the crossings. These are the types of level crossings, according to its type.

Passive

  • User worked crossing – where public user opens the gate by themselves
  • Footpath crossing – where they might not even be a gate
  • Open crossing – like footpath crossing, but for roads.
  • Barrow crossing – in stations (at the end of platform)
  • Trainman operated with barriers – the train passing through some mechanism, will activate the barrier. Train driver has to drive slowly. Still considered passive, because signaller needs to do nothing.

Active

  • Manually control – local or remote (within 400m) or very remote (CCTV).
  • Manually control barrier obstacle detector MCBOD – It’s not manual, it’s automatic and activated by (a) sensing device(s). Silly name
  • Automatically controlled – which is triggered by the train. Signaller has to monitor (which lends its name to being active.

Confusing, isn’t it?

I’ve been reading, and listening to people talk about level crossings for years, and I still have a hard time understanding all the types, let alone their intricacies and details. But while writing this post, I learned a bit more as I had to go and read about them again on Wikipedia, which helps me a lot in my understanding. Hence the title: active learning, like active level crossing, requires a lot more effort, but the rewards are much greater. In a way, it helps to reduce the risk of failing exams. Ha!

Thank you for reading.

Similar Posts

  • The Cart Before The Bus

    Apparently the news in my home country, in respect to public transport, is that the government and some companies, is planning to introduce an autonomous self-driving bus. Needless to say, this caught people’s attention. But it is still in trial, and it is not clear when the technology will be mature enough to be in…

  • Track Circuit and Train Detection: An Analogy

    Track Circuit and Train Detection: An Analogy – In railway signalling, the signaller needs to know whether a track is occupied, i.e. whether there is a train on it. An accident could happen if the signaller sends a train to a track that is occupied. Hence the development of track detection. Two of the most well used track detection is track circuit and axle counter.

  • If the shoes fit..

    Recently during shopping, my wife passed a shirt for me to try. It said “Extreme Slim Fit”. Now I used to wear slim fit shirts, but it has been ages since I bought any new ones and this shirt even had the word ‘extreme’ on it. I had to try it on. It was a…

  • The Pursuit of Worrying

    I have just finished IRSE module C and D today, a completion of the IRSE exams. Altogether there are 4 modules, A, B, C and D, and I started taking the exams with module A, in 2022. It has been 3 years constantly preparing for exams, that today I feel a bit ’empty’ after completing…

  • Advice and System Engineering

    In Systems Engineering and if you’re reading the standards for railway which is the EN 5012X series, it is mentioned that a product or an equipment in railway has different levels or applications. They are the Generic Product (GP), Generic Application (GA) and Specific Application (SA). GP can be a simple industrial PC, GA can…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *