|

Fake AI and Faking AI

I read a newsletter where it was rumoured/assumed that people were faking AI. How weird, and it turned out that wasn’t true.

Now if people were using AI to fake things up, that is quite common nowadays. Videos or audios of people, especially famous ones, can be easily created. But there’s almost always a slight misgivings that shows the media is not real. It gets harder but human still manages to discern, most of the time. However there will come a time when it is not discernible anymore, so what will happen then?

I remember when I was slightly younger, Photoshop was the rage. You can make photos of you visiting far flung places, or doing crazy things, or sometimes used to defame someone by creating fake obscene pictures. But overtime people began to realise that photos can be easily modified, and ‘photoshop’ became a verb. Over the years it is not surprising anymore to hear artists photoshopped their body and people stopped believing what they’re seeing in the magazines. But then you hear people meeting this famous artists and saying that they look gorgeous in real life.

Similarly about a decade ago, autotune was a software that could make your voice sound ‘pleasant’ and there were a number of artists that became famous who turned out to use Autotune. Then it became a bit of a norm that artists normally have their voice ‘autotuned’ or known as post-production (I must admit I do not know much about these things so I might get the terms wrong). But then you hear people going to concerts or reality music shows showing people singing live and sometimes, that people commented how good these artists’ voices are.

What I am trying to say is there will be a time that these ‘faking’ products will be saturated and people accepting the norm, but in doing so, will be going back to the original way where this ‘faking’ process is not possible. Right now people can maybe copy paste chatGPT answers and appear smart, but in the future people will most likely revert to just asking face-to-face and gauge how far you understand something.

Just like how normal communication would be.

Thank you for reading.

Similar Posts

  • Youtube As A Learning Source

    People can learn a lot from Youtube. I learnt a lot, and I used it normally when I have trouble understanding complex engineering concepts, especially after reading about them on Wikipedia. There are certain things that can need a video or at least more visual representation, in order to understand. I guess in the days…

  • Summer Haze

    Manchester for this past week has been suffering from haze and smoke. Apparently someone set the grass (or is it field) at an open area in a moor on fire, and caused a wild fire that then spread. A news article I read says it was from a firework while another says it is arson;…

  • I Must Be Getting Old (II)

    I used to always try new software, all in the hope of ever increasing productivity and making life a bit easier. It normally doesn’t make life easier, but I enjoyed it. My wife didn’t, at least not as much as every time I migrated my drive or storage system/software, she would be dragged along and…

  • Boxes of Gadgets

    I had to clear my store, or to be exact, the boiler room where I store most of my junks, because the boiler engineer had to come and inspect the state of the boiler. It’s a good thing. But when I had to put the things back in, I had to face the fact that…

  • Being A Child

    My eldest daughter was teaching her younger sister to read and was explaining it phoenitically. If you don’t know what phonics is, it is pronouncing the letters the way it sounds, not the way it is pronounced. Yeah my explanation sucks. For example you pronounce the letter ‘s’ not ‘ass’, but instead ‘ssss..’ as in…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *