FMEA and Politics

“What do politicians want?” a speaker asked an audience once. “To get more power,” came the answer. The crowd laughed. The speaker nodded, “Yes, you can argue that. They want to be voted, to stay in power.”

This memory stayed with me because at that time, I thought it was a vile thing to want, to want more power or even to stay in power. Nowadays though, I am not too sure. I have to agree, that without power, politicians can’t do what they want to do. Any human for that matter, needs to have the power (be it financial, time or even your normal body capability), to be able to do anything. And given in a larger context of a country, or society, the power is even more important (and larger), so much so, that the loss of it will incapacitate the politician and the ruling party.

Why is this important?

It is because when we understand the motive(s), then we understand the actions. So that when we can plan around this things.

Let me give another parable. When designing a product, engineers think about all the way a product can fail. Ideally all parts will last forever and never fail but that is not the case, hence the reason for the pessimistic view of parts failing. Not only that, what would happen when a product/part fail and the likelihood it to happen is also considered. All of this is then thrown into a mathematical model, where it generates a value.

Why is this important?

Is it because when we understand how things fail, we can prevent them for failing catastrophically. So that we can plan around failures and mitigate losses or even in worse cases, loss of life.

The reason that I wrote this post is that sometimes engineers are a bit jaded with how projects are commissioned. The common theme is projects, especially large and public projects, are under political will. Yes, it is always so. But engineers have to curb their dispassion by understanding that politicians work under certain motives, and they (engineers) can influence these motives, as much as politicians can stop or start a project.

Of course it’s harder said than done. I’ve done saying it, I’ll stop now.

Thank you for reading.

Similar Posts

  • Solicited Advice

    A nephew of mine came to visit recently and I had the opportunity to bring him around the places in Manchester. As we traveled a bit, we talked quite a bit too. As common when we visit another country, we complained and thrashed our country, while at the same time saying that Malaysia has the…

  • I Must Be Getting Old (III)

    My daughter asked me during dinner today if I know the meaning of the word bigback. “What?” I asked. “Bigback,” she said again. I asked her to spell it out. Still didn’t ring a bell. “It’s a term for someone who likes food,” she said. “Although it can be derogatory, depending on the tone.” “I…

  • |

    Life is an Exam

    Life is an exam, or not. All my life, or at least my early years of life, I have been prepping for exams very year. In Malaysia there is the primary school exams (UPSR) that determines whether you can go to a boarding school with better facilities and reputed more experienced teachers. There you prepare…

  • Too Much Info

    Recently I went for demonstration of a technical product for my company, and the audience was university students, a mixture of people that are either expert in the signalling field, or have no experience at all in it. Since the spectrum is very wide, the presentation aim to glance over almost all the aspects, including…

  • Inertia Is Real

    There’s always the dread of doing something (new) or picking up something that you have been leaving on the floor for a while. This is necessarily more so when you that task has no quick direct consequence but has a considerable long impact; you are more to kid yourself that the long impact wouldn’t suffer…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *