FMEA and Politics

“What do politicians want?” a speaker asked an audience once. “To get more power,” came the answer. The crowd laughed. The speaker nodded, “Yes, you can argue that. They want to be voted, to stay in power.”

This memory stayed with me because at that time, I thought it was a vile thing to want, to want more power or even to stay in power. Nowadays though, I am not too sure. I have to agree, that without power, politicians can’t do what they want to do. Any human for that matter, needs to have the power (be it financial, time or even your normal body capability), to be able to do anything. And given in a larger context of a country, or society, the power is even more important (and larger), so much so, that the loss of it will incapacitate the politician and the ruling party.

Why is this important?

It is because when we understand the motive(s), then we understand the actions. So that when we can plan around this things.

Let me give another parable. When designing a product, engineers think about all the way a product can fail. Ideally all parts will last forever and never fail but that is not the case, hence the reason for the pessimistic view of parts failing. Not only that, what would happen when a product/part fail and the likelihood it to happen is also considered. All of this is then thrown into a mathematical model, where it generates a value.

Why is this important?

Is it because when we understand how things fail, we can prevent them for failing catastrophically. So that we can plan around failures and mitigate losses or even in worse cases, loss of life.

The reason that I wrote this post is that sometimes engineers are a bit jaded with how projects are commissioned. The common theme is projects, especially large and public projects, are under political will. Yes, it is always so. But engineers have to curb their dispassion by understanding that politicians work under certain motives, and they (engineers) can influence these motives, as much as politicians can stop or start a project.

Of course it’s harder said than done. I’ve done saying it, I’ll stop now.

Thank you for reading.

Similar Posts

  • It’s a Mistake

    Years from now, people will say it is a mistake. A mistake to let it happen, to let the massacre continue. Years from now, when their predecessors have waned in their powers, the then ‘leaders’ will then admit, that it was a blunder. A blunder to let the genocide go on unchecked. Decades have gone…

  • Something To Learn

    There’s always something to learn from anyone. Travelling half the world, from the south-east of Asia to this west side of Europe, I have learned a lot of new things. It have made me humble as I realize that over the years, all my knowledge and understanding are limited to a certain geographic limitation or…

  • Driving in the UK

    Alhamdulillah I just passed my driving license. I would love to say that it was a breeze, but actually it wasn’t. It was nerve wrecking. The roads in the UK are small and tight, with cars park along the roads. It also didn’t help that I decided to take the test for manual driven car,…

  • Poorly

    For those who don’t know, poorly means unwell, or sick. I think it is a north-west/Manchester slang (Mancunian) thing. Or maybe every British uses that, I don’t know. At first I find it appalling as it seems poor equals to sick, but now I believe it came from the sorry condition one is when he/she…

  • Marathon, An Analogy

    I’ve never run a marathon. In fact, I barely run. But I have friends who run, and I am pretty sure you would do. If not, you can probably see from various social media posts about strangers who run marathons. I notice that from pictures of runners, that no one ever look good while running…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *